O Stupnytskyy


Abstract. The purpose of this article is to analyze the particularities of activities of modern
“Think Tanks” in the USA as non-governmental scientific research and information analytics
organizations, which generate ideas and develop recommendations for national governmental
and international institutions providing constructive dialogue on the solution of social, economic
and political problems in the “state-business-society” link. They are creative research
groups engaged in in-depth investigation of public policy issues and thanks to which it became
possible to turn intellectual activity from an individual creative act into a collective effort to
create new meanings. In Ukraine, the concept of a “Think Tank” is relatively new for representatives
of the scientific community, who still create the majority of significant analytical and
forecasting, and political and theoretical concepts. The lack of a full-fledged network of civil society
institutions and a sufficient accessibility to media resources and sites for their promotion
with the aim of influencing economic decision-making and political processes is associated with
the lack of transparency in the activities of state establishment and the rejection of political
elites still professing the principle of statism (concentration of economic controls and planning
in the hands of a highly centralized government). Nowadays, the use of the symbiosis of the potential
of the scientific community and the developments of Think Tanks, as analytical centers,
is one of the critical conditions for institutional reforms in Ukraine, an effective domestic economic
and foreign political strategy for the country’s development. Unfortunately, the process
of realizing that the very modern Think Tanks are the means of social engineering in general and
in political counseling in particular, and of the provision of independent political and socioeconomic
expertise, is slow and contradictory.
Key words: Think Tank, Brains Trust, institution, institutional reform, social engineering

Full Text:




Abelson D. (2002a) Do think tanks matter? Assessing the impact of public policy institutes.

Kingston and Montreal: McGill–Queen’s university press.

Abelson D. (2002b) Think tanks and U.S. Foreign Policy: as historical view,>

Akopyan О. (2010) Vedushchie mirovye fabriki mysli segodnya: novye smysly na sluzhbe

gosudarstva [Well-know international modern think tanks: new concepts serving for government].

Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy,


Balayan A, Sungurov А. (2016) Fabriki vysli i ekspertnye soobshchestva [Think tanks and

expert associations]. St.Peterburg: Аleteyya.

Bogatyreva L., Fillipov V. (2016) Аnaliticheskie tsentry vchera i segodny [Analitical centers

yesterday and today]. Moskva: Lenand.

Bubnova N. (2017) “Mozgovye tsentry” kak aktor sovremennoi politiki [“Think tanks” as

an actor of modern policy], Comparative Politics Russia 3: 8–19.

2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program

(2018), University of Pennsylvania, January,


Domazet T. (2010) Facing the Future of Economic Policy-Causes of the Crisis from the Political

Econmomy Point of View. Facing the Future of South East Europe. Croatian Institute

of Finance and Accounting, Zagreb.

Draskovic V. Draskovic M. (2012) Institutional Nihilism as a Basis for Anti-/Development

Policy. Montenegrin Journal of Economics 8 (1): 110–136.

Dunn W. (1996) A Look Inside think tanks,

Glazev S., Naumov Е. (2012) Intellektualnaya ekonomika v teorii i praktike institutsionalnogo

konstruktivizma [Intellectual economy in theory and practice of institutional constructivism],

Sbornic nauchnykh trudov. 24: 34–38.

Haass R. (2002) Think tanks and U.S. Foreign Policy: A Policy-Marces Perspective. A Policy-

Maker’s Perspective,

Haass R. (2005) The Opportunity: America’s moment history’s course. New York: Public affairs.

Актуальні проблеми міжнародних відносин. Випуск 134. 2018 109

Kamshibaev E. (2012) Intellektualnyy kanital. Kontseptsii, metody i analiz [Intellectual capital.

Conceptions, methods and analysis]. Izd-vо: Kniga po Trebovaniyu.

Kolomiiets Y. (2014) Analysis of the global practice of think tanks in the informational and

analytical support of public authorities, Efficacy public administration. Collection of scientific

works 40,

Ladi S. (2005) Globalisation, policy transfer and policy research institutes. Cheltenham: Edward

Elgar Publishing Limited.

Lindquist E. A. (1997) Beyond the myth: new challenges for think tanks,>

Makarychev A. (2015) Gosudarstva, ekspertnye soobshchestva i rezhimy znaniya-vlasti

[Governments, expert associations and regimes of knowledge-power], Politicheskaia Nauka

: 16-26.

McGann J. (2011) Global Think Tanks: Policy networks and Governance. Routledge.

Medushevskiy N. (2011) Fabriki mysli. Amerikanskaya model i podkhody k ee adaptatsii za

predelami USA [Think tanks. American model and its out-of-the-US adaptation methods].

Мoskva: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

Naumov Е., Benua А. (2012) Ustoychivoe rasvitie i teoriya institutsionalnogo konstruktivizma

[Sustainable development and the theory of institutional constructivism], Мezhdunarodnyy

elektronnyy zhurnal. Ustoychivoe razvinie: nauka i praktica 2 (9),>

Petrenko I. (2015) “Fabryky dumok” yak instrument zastosuvannya intelektu do vyrishennya

skladnykh suspilno-politychnykh problem [“Think tanks” as an instrument for use of

intelligence for complex social and political problems solution], Visnyk KNU imeni Tarasa

Shevchenka, Ser. Filosofiya/Politologiya 1 (119): 121–124.

Petrenko V. (2011) Konstruktivizm kak novay paradigma v nauke o cheloveke, [Constructivism

as a new paradigm of human science], Voprocy filosofii 6: 31–36.

Shernova N. (2013) Fabryka dumok v Ukraini yak skladova formuvannya zovnishnopolitychnogo

kursu krainy [Think tanks in Ukraine as a component of country’s foreign policy],

Sungurov А. (2015) Kak voznikayut politicheskie innovatsii. “Fabriki mysli” i drugie instituty-

mediatory [How the political innovation appear. “Think tanks” and other mediator

institutions]. Мoskva: RОSPEN.

Yasin Е., Аkindinova N., Yakobson L, Yakovlev А. (2013) Sostoitsya li novaya model ekonomicheskogo

rosta v Rossii? [Will the new economic growth model perform in Russia?]

XIV Аprelskaya mezhd. nauch. konf. po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva; Nats.

issledov. un-t “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki”Моskva, 2–5 аprelya 2013 г. Мoskva: ID

Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki.

Yerznkyan B., Gassner L. (2010) Ethics in the Different Types of Economy, Theory and

Practice of Institutional Reforms in Russia. Collection of scientific works ed. by B.

Yerznkyan 17. Moscow: CEMI Russian Academy of Sciences.



  • There are currently no refbacks.